Counter-Hegemonic Gender Discourse in Jukun Proverbs

Authors

  • Azetu Azashi Agyo Department of English and Literary Studies, Federal University, Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56666/ahyu.v6i.165

Keywords:

Counter-Hegemonic Gender Discourse, Standpoint Feminist theory, Jukun people, Jukun Proverbs

Abstract

Proverbs have long functioned as repositories of cultural wisdom, reflecting the values, beliefs, and social norms of diverse communities. The domain of gender discourse remains a dynamic arena for the negotiation of societal norms, power dynamics, and resistance to prevailing ideologies. Grounded in the theoretical framework of standpoint feminism, this study adopts a lens that acknowledges the complex interplay of gender dynamics within the Jukun community. This framework provides a nuanced perspective for understanding how counter-hegemonic gender discourse emerges within the broad context of Jukun proverbs. Employing a qualitative research approach, this project conducts a comprehensive analysis of a diverse range of Jukun proverbs, exploring the cultural, historical and social contexts that have nurtured counter-hegemonic expressions among the Jukun. The proverbs are examined not only as linguistic artifacts but also as reflections of lived experiences and resistance to dominant narratives. Within this rich linguistic framework, the work uncovers the subtle yet potent expressions that challenge, subvert or redefine traditional gender norms and ideologies. Ultimately, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of the intricate relationship between language, culture and gender, shedding light on the evolving dynamics of gender discourse within this diverse and vibrant community. It reaffirms the importance of linguistic and cultural analysis in the pursuit of gender equity and social change.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-04

How to Cite

Agyo, A. A. . (2023). Counter-Hegemonic Gender Discourse in Jukun Proverbs. Ahyu: A Journal of Language and Literature, 6, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.56666/ahyu.v6i.165
Share |