Socio-legal Discourse Analysis of a Selected Court Proceeding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56666/ahyu.v7i.192Keywords:
socio-legal discourse, legal language, court proceedingAbstract
Socio-legal discourse is an emerging interdisciplinary area of research in which laws or legal documents are analysed via a sociolinguistics’ lens. This paper identifies and discusses the relationship between language and law in a selected court proceeding. The researchers identify some features of discourse, which include exchange, move and act. The analysis adopts Sinclaire and Courlthard’s (1975) discourse rank scale and places court proceedings under the rank of lesson. A bottom-top approach is adopted in this placement such that at the level of discourse acts, the analysis focuses on informative, elicitation and directive acts. In the discussion, the paper examines some discourse elements such as "focusing and framing move," "opening and answering move," as well as "follow-up move." For the socio-legal components of the text, discourse cohesion and coherence are used as tools of analysis. This paper reveals that these discourse features used in legal documents help to unify the sequence of events during court proceedings. Thus, it concludes that an understanding of these socio-legal discourse structures will provide greater insights into the examination of legal proceedings in law courts in Nigeria.
Downloads
References
Aboh, R. & Uduk, H. (2017). Meaning in discourse: An introduction to discourse analysis. Ibadan: Kraft Book Limited.
Aceron, M. R. (2015). Conventional analysis: The judge and lawyer's courtroom interactions. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 3(5):120-126.
Akhimien, P. E. & Farotimi.Y. (2018).A study of the conversational features and discourse strategies in selected sermons of Pastor E. A. Adeboye. American journal of linguistics. 6(1):1-8.
Antony, F. (2014). Cohesion in conversation: A discourse stylistic approach on Amitav Gosh's Sea of Poppies. International Journal of Science and Research. 3(10):535-538.
Berry, M. (1989). "Is teaching an unanalyzed concept" in M. A. K. Halliday and R. P. Faocett (eds). New developments in systemic linguistics. London: Frances Printer
Berukstiene, D. (2016). Legal discourse reconsidered: Genres of legal texts. Comparative Legilinguistics.28: 89-117.
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226
Cheng, L. & Danesi, M. (2009). Exploring Legal Discourse: A Sociosemiotic (i.e.) Construction. Social semiotics. 29 (3): 279–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587841
Ekpang, J. N. (2015). Languages, Identity and Immigrants in Adiche's Americana. Calabar Journal of Liberal Studies, 19(1):79-94.
Ekpang, J. N. (2017). Rhetoric and social justice in Nelson Mandela’s ‘I am prepared to die’ speech. Humanities and Social Science Review. CD-ROM. 06(02):441-448.
Ekpang, J. N. and Goodwin, O. C. (2020).A Lexico-Semantic Analysis of Selected Speeches of Honourable Patrick Obahiagba. LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research, 17(3), 69-94.
Gibbons, J. B. (1994). Language and the law. London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longmans.
Ifversen, J. (2003). Text, Discourse, Concept: Approaches to Textual Analysis. KONTUR.
Johnson, A. J. (2014). Legal discourse: processes of making evidence in specialised legal corpora. In: Schneider, KP and Barron, A, (eds.) Pragmatics of Discourse. Handbooks of Pragmatics, 3. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin , pp. 525-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214406-020
Kirby, M. (2007). Forward note in Deborah Cao’s Translating Law. London, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. vii-x. https://doi.org/10.21832/978185359955.
Levenbook, B. B. (1984). Law and Philosophy: The Role of coherence in legal reasoning. Online learning platform. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211223
Mellinkoff, D. (1963). The language of the law. Boston & Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.
Okata, G. N. (2019). Power and manipulative functions of language: A critical discourse analysis of Chima Utov's Our Wives have Gone Made Again. Journal of Advances in Social Science and Humanity.5(7): 889-895.
Ogolekwu, O. (2021). Language and Religion. An Evaluation Grammatical Cohesion in Selected Pentecostal Sermons in Nigeria. Ushie, G. O., Inyabri, I. T. & Ebim, A. M. (Eds.) Language and Literary Studies in Society.A Festschrift for Professor Eno Grace Nta; pp.89-112.
Ogolekwu, O., Jibrin, M. A. and Agu, E. C. (2022). Effects of Language Variations on Gender Communication: A Study of Idoma Language. Ibadan: Agunbay Publishers.
Osisanwo, W. (2008). Introduction to Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics (2nded.) Ibadan: Alafas Nigeria.
Sadiq, M. T. (2011). A discourse analysis of the language of interrogation in police/criminal investigations in the Kano metropolis.Thesis: English Department, Amadu Bello University.
Wagner, A. & Cheng, L. (2011). Exploring court discourse: Language, power and control in courtroom discourse. ASHGATE e-BOOK.
Yule, G. (2010). The study of language (4th Ed.) New York: Cambridge University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Juliet Nkane Ekpang, Oche Ogolekwu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ALL ARTICLES ARE PUBLISHED UNDER THE FOLLOWING LICENSE:
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
This license requires that reusers give credit to the creator. It allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, for noncommercial purposes only. If others modify or adapt the material, they must license the modified material under identical terms.
* * * * * * * * * * ``
BY: Credit must be given to you, the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial use of your work is permitted.Noncommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation.
SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.
