A Cognitive Stylistic Analysis of Oswald Mtshali’s “Men in Chains”

Authors

  • Joy Isa Department of English and Literary Studies, Federal University Wukari, Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56666/ahyu.v7i.193

Keywords:

Cognitive Stylistic, Schema theory, Conceptual Metaphor theory, Figures of Speech, Men in Chains

Abstract

This paper presents a cognitive stylistic analysis of the poem “Men in Chains” by Oswald Mbuyiseni Mtshali (1968). Cognitive stylistics focuses primarily on explaining what happens during the reading process and how it influences the interpretations made by readers in understanding textual meaning. Though meaning is located in the formal structure of the literary text, readers can also approach meaning by deploying aspects of their previous background knowledge. Therefore, the study examines how a special configuration of language is used to realise a particular subject matter and a few selected figurative tropes to achieve a special aesthetic purpose. In the research, all primary data were sourced from the poem, and the secondary data were derived from related works and textbooks. The Schema Theory introduced by Richard C. Anderson (1977) and Conceptual Metaphor Theory by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson (1980) were used to analyse the data collected for the study. The analysis reveals that coherence among figures of speech and the use of extended and complex figurative expressions create new stylistic frameworks and metaphorical formulas that illustrate the idea of novelty and creativity in the poem. Based on the above, the work concludes that cognitive stylistics is effective in the study and interpretation of poetry. It can also be used in studying and teaching poetry to enhance better understanding and appreciation of any poetic texts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Joy Isa, Department of English and Literary Studies, Federal University Wukari, Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria

Joy Isa is a Lecturer in the Department of English and Literary Studies, Federal University, Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria. Her research areas include literary and linguistic stylistics, cognitive stylistics, and applied linguistics in general. She’s currently a doctoral scholar at Federal University Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Email: <[email protected]>/<[email protected]>.

References

Anderson, R. C. (1977). The Notion of Schemata and the Educational Enterprise. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Anderson, R. C. (1984). Role of the Reader’s Schema in Comprehension, Learning, and Memory. In R. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to Read in American schools: Basal Readers and Content Texts, pp. 243-257. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Aworo, J. O. (2017). A Practical Guide to Stylistics. Lagos: Nirpri Publishers.

Alexander, M. & Emmott C. (2009). “Schemata”. In: Huhn, Peter et al. (eds): the living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University.

Childs, P. &Fowler, R. (2006). The Routledge Dictionary of Literary Terms. Routledge: London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203462911

Dancygier, B & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative Language. University Printing House, Cambridge: United Kingdom.

Emmott et al. (2014). Schema Theory in Stylistics. In Burke, M. (ed). The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics (pp268-283) London: Routledge.

Fromkin, et al. (2007). An Introduction to Language. Boston: Thomas Higher Education.

Gavins, J. & Steen G. (2003). Cognitive Poetics in Practice. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203417737

Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Idris, M. M. Y. (2017). Linguistic Variation: A Problem for Standardisation. A Case Study of the Jukun of Taraba State. Ahyu: A Journal of Language and Literature. DOI: 10.56666/ahyu.v1i.102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56666/ahyu.v1i.102

Jeffries, L. & Mclntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics: Cambridge Text Books in Linguistics. London.

Katz, et al. (1998). Figurative Language and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195109627.001.0001

Lakoff, G. & Mark J. (1980). Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language. In The Journal of philosophy, 77.8, 453 486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2025464

Marszalek, A. (2012). Humorous Worlds: A Cognitive Stylistic Approach to the Creation of Humour in Comic Narratives. MPhil(R)Thesis http://theses.gla.ac.uk/4156/ 5.8.

Napoleon Jr. M. M. (2018). Speech Act Theory: From Austin to Searle. Augustinian: A Journal for Humanities, Social Sciences, Business, and Education, 19 (1): 3545.

Rumelhart, D. (1980). Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition. In: R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce & W. F. Brewer. (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics. A Resource Book for Students. Routledge: London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496589

Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. Routledge: London.

Woldemariam, H. M. (2015). The Teaching and Learning of Poetry at Postgraduate Level: A Cognitive Stylistics Approach. PoN (NUST), Polytechnic of Namibia, Department of Communication Windhoek, Namibia.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-04

How to Cite

Isa, J. . (2024). A Cognitive Stylistic Analysis of Oswald Mtshali’s “Men in Chains” . Ahyu: A Journal of Language and Literature, 7, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.56666/ahyu.v7i.193
Share |